Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having a score of 84.3 against 81. Although LG G8 ThinQ is somewhat thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro, it's somewhat lighter and also extremely newer. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but LG G8 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version, so it offers some additional features and performance improvements.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. LG G8 ThinQ features a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger display.
LG G8 ThinQ shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot bigger diafragm aperture. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit superior battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.