Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 overall score. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro, it's lighter and also newer. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a 16 megapixels resolution back facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a way better (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with greater battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.