Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. Although LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro, it's somewhat lighter and also newer. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ features a sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a quite bigger screen and more pixels per inch of screen.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ takes better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to take better photos in low light situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features superior battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.