Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's notably thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit larger display, a bit more pixels per display inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot more MP camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a much higher video resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ features superior battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.