Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with a global score of 91.2 against 81. LG Wing is a noticeably newer device than the Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is way thicker and way heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but LG Wing has an older 10 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
LG Wing has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG Wing features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite greater screen pixels density, a little bit bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Wing has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. LG Wing features a battery duration that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro one.
The LG Wing captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos, a lot better (4K) video quality and a much more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.