Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and Forged Green |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than Motorola Defy (2021), having a global score of 81 against 77.2. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version, giving you some nice extra features and improved performance. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is an extremely older cellphone than Motorola Defy (2021), but it's somewhat lighter and extremely thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a higher pixels amount per inch of screen. Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a CPU that is just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy C9 Pro, and although the Motorola Defy (2021) has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Defy (2021) has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Defy (2021) counts with slightly more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Defy (2021) has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.