Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with an 89.6 score against 81. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola edge has 10 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Motorola edge's construction has the same weight than Galaxy C9 Pro, but it is incredibly thicker.
The Motorola edge features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite higher amount of pixels in each display inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Motorola edge features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. They have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Motorola edge takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher video resolution, a larger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a camera in the back with way more megapixels. The Motorola edge has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola edge counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.