Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Mineral Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a general score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's global score of 81. Even though Motorola Edge (2022) is thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro, it's a little lighter and also notably newer. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has older 12 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit greater pixel count in each inch of screen, a quite larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with improved battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Motorola Edge (2022) shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution, a larger aperture for better low-light images and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.