Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a general score of 81 against 78.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version, so it provides a couple additional features and better performance. Although the Galaxy C9 Pro is older and heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's body is still just a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bigger display and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little better battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a greater camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a camera with much more mega pixels and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.