Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a general score of 81 against 80.9. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version, giving some extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy C9 Pro design is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, even though it was released 6 years before.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, a little greater pixels count in each screen inch and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a way better video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with superior battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.