Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40, having an 81 score against 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a older and heavier phone than Motorola Edge 40, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner anyway. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 40 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little better pixels amount per inch of display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Motorola Edge 40 counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.