Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the older 14 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Neo is thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro, it's a bit lighter and also a lot newer.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a better 1256 x 2760px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.