Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with a global score of 86.3 against 81. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the previous 14 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a way newer and just a bit lighter phone than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is somewhat thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution, a lot bigger camera aperture and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.