Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's global score of 81. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it is a bit heavier and noticeably thicker.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display, a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better (4K) video quality, a much higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little better battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.