Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Surfing blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with a score of 82.6 against 81. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus design is notably newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is thicker and a bit heavier. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the display, a little bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Moto G 5G Plus captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a much better video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos. The Moto G 5G Plus has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.