Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Smoke black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the Moto G Power, getting an 81 score against 76.1. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto G Power has Android 11, giving some nice extra features. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is just a little lighter and incredibly thinner than the Moto G Power, although it was released many years before.
The Moto G Power and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro count with extremely similar CPUs, and although the Moto G Power has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Moto G Power counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2300.
The Motorola Moto G Power captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a much better (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G Power features improved battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.