Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s overall score of 79.3. The Galaxy C9 Pro is an notably older cellphone than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but Samsung managed to build it lighter and way thinner anyway. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite bigger display and a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better (4K) video definition, a larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Moto G Stylus (2021) has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G Stylus (2021) and Galaxy C9 Pro have similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.