Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. Moto G200 5G's construction is newer than Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's extremely thicker and a little bit heavier. These devices use Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. The Moto G200 5G has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bit greater pixels count per inch of screen.
The Moto G200 5G shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Moto G200 5G also has a back camera with lot more MP and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
Moto G200 5G features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.