Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-02-24 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a score of 81 against 75.8. These devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has older 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Even though Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and Moto Z Force were released only a couple months apart, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is somewhat heavier but just a little thinner than Moto Z Force.
The Moto Z Force counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has more cores (although slower) and a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Motorola Moto Z Force captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and video, a lot higher video quality and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.