Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having an 81 score against 76.4. The Galaxy C9 Pro body is a bit thinner but heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and both of them were released only 7 months apart. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores (but slower).
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 14% more battery size. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.