Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gold | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro design is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.