Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. The Galaxy C9 Pro is a noticeably heavier and thicker phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Moto Z2 Play features a little bit better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Moto Z2 Play features a bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 1920px resolution, the Moto Z2 Play also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density. The Moto Z2 Play has just a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture for better captures in low-light situations.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy C9 Pro has longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.