Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Gold | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than Moto Z3 Play, getting a score of 81 against 76.3. The Galaxy C9 Pro is a heavier cellphone than the Moto Z3 Play, but both of them are 0.27inches thick. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has more RAM.
Moto Z3 Play features a bit sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Moto Z3 Play also has a slightly better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a bit greater amount of pixels per display inch. Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features better battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Moto Z3 Play shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.