Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Oxford blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. Motorola One 5G's body is notably newer, but just a bit heavier and noticeably thicker than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Motorola One 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola One 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit greater pixel count in each screen inch, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. The Motorola One 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One 5G counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot higher video definition, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a much more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.