Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Motorola One Action, having an 81 score against 78.5. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is incredibly older and a little heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's body is still much thinner. The Motorola One Action features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit better pixel density, a little bit bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels.
The Motorola One Action counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Action features a bit faster processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola One Action has just a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.