Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting an 81 score against 79.8. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, providing the user a couple additional features. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is an older cellphone than the Motorola One Hyper, but it's thinner and a little bit lighter anyway.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a quite better pixels number per inch of screen and a little bit bigger screen. Motorola One Hyper counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Hyper has a CPU that's very similar to the processor in Galaxy C9 Pro, and although the Motorola One Hyper has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola One Hyper features a greater camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy C9 Pro and the Motorola One Hyper have extremely similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.