Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a overall score of 81 against 80. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is way thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola One Zoom, although it was released many years before. Motorola One Zoom has a slightly better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit larger screen and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy C9 Pro and the Motorola One Zoom have extremely similar processors, and although the Motorola One Zoom has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations and a camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola One Zoom features a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows 128 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola One Zoom's battery performance is very similar to the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.