Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 overall score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Motorola razr (2020) is a way newer phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is a bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 876 x 2142px resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel count per display inch and a quite bigger display. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.