Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, having a general score of 81.1 against 81. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2022) has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Motorola razr (2022) is a noticeably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is a little bit heavier and a bit thicker.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a little more pixels per display inch and a quite bigger display. The Motorola razr (2022) features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.