Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2023-03-29 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.25 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Carbon Black |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than the Motorola ThinkPhone's 78.9 overall score. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's design is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola ThinkPhone, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola ThinkPhone has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a much powerful CPU than Motorola ThinkPhone, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The Motorola ThinkPhone has a better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit greater screen density and a bit larger display.
Motorola ThinkPhone has a superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture. Motorola ThinkPhone counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola ThinkPhone has greater battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.