Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than Nokia 9 PureView, having an 81 score against 76.4. Despite of the fact Galaxy C9 Pro is noticeably older and a little bit heavier than the Nokia 9 PureView, it's body is still somewhat thinner. The Nokia 9 PureView has a much better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the Nokia 9 PureView also has more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy C9 Pro has better battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Nokia 9 PureView shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a much better video definition and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.