| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-11-09 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Midnight Blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.24 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Nokia X100, with an 81 score against 77.3. Both devices we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Nokia X100 has Android 11 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is notably older than the Nokia X100, it's body is much thinner and lighter.
The Nokia X100 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite larger display and a just a bit higher pixels count in each inch in the display. The Nokia X100 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. They have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy C9 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Nokia X100, although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 16 MP resolution. Nokia X100 counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Nokia X100 counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4470mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.