Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 score. Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit larger screen, a little bit more pixels per display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit more storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.