Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's overall score of 77.7. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a way older and just a bit heavier phone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, but Samsung was able to make it a bit thinner anyway.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a brighter display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite bigger screen. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a bit better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a very superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light captures and video. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a battery performance that is very similar to the Galaxy C9 Pro one, although the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a 1% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.