Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 general score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is notably older than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a little sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little higher screen density and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution. Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.