Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 general score. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is somewhat thinner but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and they were released only 1 months apart. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 1920px, the Galaxy A5 (2017) also counts with a bit higher display density. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A5 (2017) features a camera that is very similar to the camera in Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, they have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, a 16 mega-pixels back-facing camera, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.