Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50s's design is newer and somewhat lighter than Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is also a bit thicker. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Galaxy A50s has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. Galaxy A50s has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a bit bigger display and a little bit greater display pixel density.
The Galaxy A50s has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a battery performance that is very similar to the battery lifetime in Galaxy C9 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.