Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G design is extremely newer and just a bit lighter than Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's also thicker. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little higher pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A51 5G features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.