Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's general score of 81. Galaxy A52's design is incredibly newer, but a little bit heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. The Galaxy A52 features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bit higher screen pixels density and a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality. Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.