Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, having a overall score of 91.3 against 81. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G design is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's thicker and just a bit heavier.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little larger screen and a little greater number of pixels in each screen inch. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much more megapixels back camera, a lot better (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy A52 5G features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.