Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a a lot newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is thicker and just a bit heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A52s counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite greater count of pixels per display inch, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A52s features a way better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera, a much better (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.