Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A70, although it is a little bit heavier and was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy A70 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution. Galaxy A70 counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.