Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 81. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 has older 11 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 construction is noticeably newer and just a little lighter than Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is just a little thicker.
Galaxy A71 counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher display density, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little larger display. Galaxy A71 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A71 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot more mega pixels camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light situations.
Galaxy A71 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.