Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Galaxy C9 Pro, having a 92.9 score against 81. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body weights the same than the Galaxy C9 Pro, but it is thicker. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little more pixels per inch of display, a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.