Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 81. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, but it's notably heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow, so it offers a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a higher resolution of 1536 x 2152px. The Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy Fold features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The Galaxy Fold takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy Fold has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.