Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's score of 81. Samsung Galaxy M51's body is extremely newer, but much thicker and heavier than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy M51 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 has a slightly better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bit larger display and a quite higher pixel density.
Galaxy M51 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better (4K) video definition, a back camera with lot more MP and a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low light environments. Galaxy M51 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 75 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.