Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with a 98.9 score against 81. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a noticeably newer cellphone than Galaxy C9 Pro, but it's a little bit heavier and thicker. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bigger screen and a higher screen density. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way higher resolution back camera. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.