Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 81. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is extremely older and somewhat thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro, it's design is still lighter. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a quite better screen density. Galaxy C9 Pro has a better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has lesser cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Galaxy C9 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images and videos in low-light situations and a camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.