Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a global score of 81 against 79.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is newer and a little thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more cpu cores (although slower) and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an incredibly better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixels count in each inch in the display.
Galaxy Note 5 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and a F1.9 aperture, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Galaxy C9 Pro has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.