Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a global score of 81 against 80.4. Even though Galaxy C9 Pro and Galaxy Note Fan Edition were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy C9 Pro's body is heavier but thinner. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video and a much better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's one, they have an external memory card slot that holds up to 256 GB and exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy C9 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.